Skip to content
ORFORD · L-1B FIELD GUIDE

In Orford, should a short project budget exclude immigration preparation costs automatically?

Sources checked:

THE DIRECT ANSWER

Confirm the actual process, professional scope and charges required for the proposed work.

Budget for the real requirements

The number of assignment days does not determine every government or professional charge. A small project value cannot waive eligibility conditions or guarantee a simplified outcome.

Build the budget from the actual filing and evidence plan rather than the project's contract value or number of onsite days. Confirm current government charges through the official fee schedule, then identify translation, corporate-record, travel-history, knowledge-documentation, and professional-review costs. None of those payments relaxes the governing rules: the worker needs one continuous qualifying year abroad during the preceding three, specialized company knowledge plus a qualifying relationship with an operating parent, branch, subsidiary, or affiliate. Prior L stays count against the five-year L-1B maximum. For customer-site work, budget time to review control provisions because labour-for-hire placement is not cured by paying an expedited charge. A common mistake is omitting preparation because the assignment earns little revenue.

Hypothetical example: an Orford veterinary-equipment firmware specialist is scheduled for a six-day update at a distributor's facility. The employer should price the petition path, certified corporate records, payroll evidence, technical documentation, and contract review before promising a fixed margin. Manuals and bug reports may demonstrate proprietary expertise; they do not establish foreign service or control. If the distributor will supervise ordinary programming, a larger legal budget cannot transform the facts into L-1B eligibility, so the work structure should be decided before fees are committed.