Read it.
Use it.
Focused guides for the questions that need more than a quick answer. Each includes a worksheet to prepare your next conversation.
Guides for your next decision.
Build a TN employer evidence brief before drafting the letter
Read & prepare Applicant planningKeep an L-1A new-office record from approval to extension
Read & prepare Applicant planningCompare the E-2 evidence for a startup and a business purchase
Read & prepare U.S. destination planningCanadian RN planning for New York State
Read & prepare U.S. destination planningCanadian RN planning for California
Read & prepareSeven decisions, answered before you prepare.
Explain the actual profession behind the company’s grade
Applicants in the Canton of Hatley should use the employer’s real duties and terms rather than assume a junior or senior label determines TN eligibility. The reader must decide which route to file: presenting the file at the port of entry, which suits Canadians with a firm start date, or an I-129 petition when the employer wants a written approval before relocation. The choice changes nothing about eligibility, only about who examines the evidence first.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Assess the professional requirements
- Describe the effective engagement
- Let the degree, not the grade, name the profession
- Decide the procedure after the evidence is fixed
Distinguish residence and reputation from eligibility evidence
A resident of the Canton of Hatley may hold Canadian PR and work for a familiar brand. Neither fact automatically establishes the requirements of a US immigration route. A permanent resident whose citizenship application is pending must decide whether to wait for the passport that unlocks TN or to use the nationality they hold today for a route that accepts it. Waiting is not neutral: the job offer, the funds and the family’s schedule all age while the application sits in the queue.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Check the actual nonimmigrant conditions
- Review the investor’s own case
- Use the passport in hand, not the one being applied for
- Keep the Canadian file alive while pursuing the U.S. one
Connect earlier purchases to the current enterprise
An investor in the Canton of Hatley should explain the actual rights and capital represented by payments made before the final operating entity was organized. The reader must decide whether to close the purchase before applying, accepting the risk of owning a U.S. business without the status to run it, or to hold the price in an escrow that releases only on visa issuance. Both satisfy the requirement that funds be irrevocably committed; a refundable deposit satisfies neither.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Preserve the transaction chain
- Complete the treaty-investor conditions
- Choose between closing outright and a visa-contingent escrow
- Prove the seasonal business is more than marginal
- Decide whether an equal partnership still lets you direct
Prove the qualifying group beyond shared branding
A business in the Canton of Hatley should identify the actual relationship with the proposed US operation instead of treating a common brand as the whole corporate analysis. The company must decide, before filing, how much of the first year the transferee will spend doing the operating work himself. A launch plan in which the manager drives the trucks is honest but points away from L-1A; the decision is either to hire drivers early enough that his duties become primarily managerial within the year, or to send him under a different arrangement.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Establish the relationship and foreign service
- Support the actual first-year role
- Plan the hiring so the manager stops driving
- Which document decides the extension
Compare the corporate link with the rights in the investment
Applicants in the Canton of Hatley should assess the actual group relationship for a transfer and the actual resource commitments for an investor case. A founder who owns the whole company must decide which record will carry the case: the payroll and duties history that supports an L-1A transfer, or the capital commitment and control that support E-2. The same person can qualify for both, yet the evidence, the time limits and the path afterwards are different.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Use the transferee’s own evidence
- Use the enterprise’s actual rights
- Choose the record that already exists
- Compare the ceilings and what comes after
Keep another person’s outcome separate from your family’s case
Households in the Canton of Hatley should assess each person’s actual eligibility and permission rather than rely on a colleague, project announcement or service promise. The first decision is whether a spouse who intends to earn in the United States should travel as a dependant at all. A dependant classification is quick to obtain but may forbid the very work the household is counting on, so compare the spouse’s own eligibility before choosing the simpler admission.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Review work authorization individually
- Apply family eligibility and the actual residence sequence
- Decide between a dependant admission and the spouse’s own classification
- Which record settles each person’s permission
Read the scope of a decision or guarantee before relying on it
Investors in the Canton of Hatley should separate actual programme requirements from favourable project language and private service promises. The decision that a promise cannot make for the investor is whether the enterprise will genuinely employ ten qualifying workers within the required period. If the honest hiring plan reaches eight, the EB-5 route is not viable however attractive the project literature, and a Gold Card gift does not solve that shortfall because it is not an investment at all.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Read the notice and service contract as different documents
- Establish the individual EB-5 case
- Separate Gold Card payments from private refunds
- Use actual residence milestones
- Count the jobs the way the petition will be judged
- What each route does with the money if the case fails