No. A private schedule does not control vetting, visa availability or the residence process.
Plan from official milestones
Read any private remedy for delay separately from the actual case requirements. A refund clause does not authorize work, confer residence or guarantee a decision by a chosen date.
Use official events, not a provider’s target date, to build the sequence. The applicant enters through the online application; a nonrefundable US$15,000 DHS processing charge accompanies it. A later USCIS instruction prompts Form I-140G; vetting follows, and a gift of US$1 million should reach the United States only upon the subsequent request. Admissibility, visa availability, and qualification under EB-1 or EB-2 can create separate dependencies that a private timetable cannot control. The Gold Card framework is not EB-5, and its gift is not an at-risk job-creating investment. Re-verify the official steps before each payment, because a refund remedy cannot confer status or authorize work.
Hypothetical example: a mathematics professor in the Canton of Hatley is promised completion before his academic leave ends. He instead charts only verifiable milestones: portal submission, processing receipt, USCIS prompt, I-140G filing, vetting, any gift request and the remaining immigrant process. His publication record and proposed work are reviewed for the claimed EB-1 or EB-2 basis while he maintains his existing lawful arrangements. If the provider misses its date, the contract may supply a private remedy, but it cannot accelerate the government or justify early relocation.